COPSAC COPSAC COPSAC COPSAC
  • About COPSAC
    • About
    • Organization Diagram
    • Board of Directors
    • Research team
    • Location
    • Funding
    • Logo
    • Open positions
  • COPSAC cohorts
    • COPSAC2000 cohort
    • COPSAC2010 cohort
    • COPSACSEVERE cohort
    • COPSACACUTE cohort
    • Methods
    • Data overview
      • COPSAC2000 Clinic
      • COPSAC2000 Exposures
      • COPSAC2000 Omics
      • COPSAC2000 Biobank
      • COPSAC2010 Clinic
      • COPSAC2010 Exposures
      • COPSAC2010 Omics
      • COPSAC2010 Biobank
  • Dissemination
    • Theses
    • Literature for parents
  • Research Projects
    • RestoreGut
    • COPSYCH Research Alliance
    • HEDIMED Consortium
    • EDIAQI Consortium
    • EAGLE Consortium
    • EarlyVir
  • Strategy
  • ‌

“To wheeze or not to wheeze”: That is not the question.

    Home Publications “To wheeze or not to wheeze”: That is not the question.
    NextPrevious

    “To wheeze or not to wheeze”: That is not the question.

    By Dansk Børne Astma Center | Publications | Comments are Closed | 7 August, 2012 |

    J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Aug
    Skytt N, Bønnelykke K, Bisgaard H.

    Abstract
    BACKGROUND:
    The diagnosis of asthma in young children is difficult and based on clinical assessment of symptoms and results of physical examination. Respiratory wheeze has traditionally been used to define asthma in young children.

    OBJECTIVE:
    We sought to compare the qualitative diagnosis of wheeze with a quantitative global assessment of significant troublesome lung symptoms during the first 3 years of life as a predictor of asthma by age 7 years.

    METHODS:
    Children born to asthmatic mothers (n= 411) were followed prospectively to age 7 years. Parents were instructed to visit the research clinic during the first 3 years of life each time the child had significant troublesome lung symptoms for 3 days. At the clinic, a research physician performed a physical examination, including auscultation for wheeze and excluding differential diagnoses. We tested whether wheeze was independently associated with asthma at age 7 years after adjusting for the total number of episodes.

    RESULTS:
    Three hundred thirteen children had full follow-up by age 7 years. In a multivariable analysis the total number of acute clinic visits for asthma symptom was significantly associated with later asthma (P< .0001), whereas the presence of wheeze at these visits was not (P= .5). The total number of acute clinic visits for significant troublesome lung symptoms was also significantly associated with later asthma in children who had never presented with any wheeze (P= .03).

    CONCLUSION:
    A quantitative global assessment of significant troublesome lung symptoms in the first 3 years of life is a better predictor of asthma than assessment of wheeze. Doctor-diagnosed wheeze is not a prerequisite for the diagnosis of asthma, and relying on the symptom of wheeze will likely be an important cause of undertreatment.

    PMID: 22766098

    No tags.
    NextPrevious

    CONTACT

    COPSAC
    Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood
    Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev-Gentofte
    phone +45 3867 7360
    contact@copsac.com
    COPSAC • Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev-Gentofte • Denmark © 2023
    • About COPSAC
      • About
      • Organization Diagram
      • Board of Directors
      • Research team
      • Location
      • Funding
      • Logo
      • Open positions
    • COPSAC cohorts
      • COPSAC2000 cohort
      • COPSAC2010 cohort
      • COPSACSEVERE cohort
      • COPSACACUTE cohort
      • Methods
      • Data overview
        • COPSAC2000 Clinic
        • COPSAC2000 Exposures
        • COPSAC2000 Omics
        • COPSAC2000 Biobank
        • COPSAC2010 Clinic
        • COPSAC2010 Exposures
        • COPSAC2010 Omics
        • COPSAC2010 Biobank
    • Dissemination
      • Theses
      • Literature for parents
    • Research Projects
      • RestoreGut
      • COPSYCH Research Alliance
      • HEDIMED Consortium
      • EDIAQI Consortium
      • EAGLE Consortium
      • EarlyVir
    • Strategy
    • ‌
    COPSAC