COPSAC COPSAC COPSAC COPSAC
  • About COPSAC
    • About
    • Organization Diagram
    • Board of Directors
    • Research team
    • Location
    • Funding
    • Logo
    • Open positions
  • COPSAC cohorts
    • COPSAC2000 cohort
    • COPSAC2010 cohort
    • COPSACSEVERE cohort
    • COPSACACUTE cohort
    • Methods
    • Data overview
      • COPSAC2000 Clinic
      • COPSAC2000 Exposures
      • COPSAC2000 Omics
      • COPSAC2000 Biobank
      • COPSAC2010 Clinic
      • COPSAC2010 Exposures
      • COPSAC2010 Omics
      • COPSAC2010 Biobank
  • Dissemination
    • Theses
    • Literature for parents
  • Research Projects
    • RestoreGut
    • COPSYCH Research Alliance
    • HEDIMED Consortium
    • EDIAQI Consortium
    • EAGLE Consortium
    • EarlyVir
  • Strategy
  • ‌

The effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young asthmatic children: a dose comparison study.

    Home Publications The effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young asthmatic children: a dose comparison study.
    NextPrevious

    The effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young asthmatic children: a dose comparison study.

    By Dansk Børne Astma Center | Publications | Comments are Closed | 11 July, 1999 |

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul
    Bisgaard H, Gillies J, Groenewald M, Maden C.

    Abstract
    The response in asthmatic young children to inhaled steroids within the usual pediatric dose range is unknown. We therefore evaluated the dose-related response in young children with moderate asthma to inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) (delivered via the Babyhaler spacer device) within the pediatric dose range. A total of 237 children (mean age 28 mo, range 12 to 47) with moderate asthmatic symptoms were studied in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study of 12 wk treatment following a 4-wk run-in period. The median use of rescue medication was 1 dose in 2 d during the run-in period. FP 50 micrograms twice daily (FP100) and 100 micrograms twice daily (FP200) was compared with placebo inhaled from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) and the Babyhaler spacer device. With FP200 there was a statistically significant improvement from baseline, as compared with the placebo group, in 8 of 10 diary card parameters, including the three symptom domains of wheeze, cough, and breathlessness, and use of rescue medication. FP100 produced a significant reduction in 5 of these 10 parameters, whereas no significant differences were found between the FP200 and FP100. The numbers of patients with at least one exacerbation during treatment with placebo, FP100, and FP200 were 37%, 26%, and 20%, respectively. This difference between placebo and FP200, as well as the dose-related order was significant (p < 0.05). Both FP doses were as well tolerated as placebo over the 12 wk treatment with a similar incidence of adverse effects. Asthmatic symptoms in 1- to 3-yr-old children responded in a significant and dose-related manner to treatment with FP within a pediatric dose range.

    PMID: 10390389

    No tags.
    NextPrevious

    CONTACT

    COPSAC
    Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood
    Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev-Gentofte
    phone +45 3867 7360
    contact@copsac.com
    COPSAC • Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev-Gentofte • Denmark © 2023
    • About COPSAC
      • About
      • Organization Diagram
      • Board of Directors
      • Research team
      • Location
      • Funding
      • Logo
      • Open positions
    • COPSAC cohorts
      • COPSAC2000 cohort
      • COPSAC2010 cohort
      • COPSACSEVERE cohort
      • COPSACACUTE cohort
      • Methods
      • Data overview
        • COPSAC2000 Clinic
        • COPSAC2000 Exposures
        • COPSAC2000 Omics
        • COPSAC2000 Biobank
        • COPSAC2010 Clinic
        • COPSAC2010 Exposures
        • COPSAC2010 Omics
        • COPSAC2010 Biobank
    • Dissemination
      • Theses
      • Literature for parents
    • Research Projects
      • RestoreGut
      • COPSYCH Research Alliance
      • HEDIMED Consortium
      • EDIAQI Consortium
      • EAGLE Consortium
      • EarlyVir
    • Strategy
    • ‌
    COPSAC