COPSAC COPSAC COPSAC COPSAC
  • About COPSAC
    • About
    • Organization Diagram
    • Board of Directors
    • Research team
    • Location
    • Funding
    • Logo
    • Open positions
  • COPSAC cohorts
    • COPSAC2000 cohort
    • COPSAC2010 cohort
    • COPSACSEVERE cohort
    • COPSACACUTE cohort
    • Methods
    • Data overview
      • COPSAC2000 Clinic
      • COPSAC2000 Exposures
      • COPSAC2000 Omics
      • COPSAC2000 Biobank
      • COPSAC2010 Clinic
      • COPSAC2010 Exposures
      • COPSAC2010 Omics
      • COPSAC2010 Biobank
  • Dissemination
    • Theses
    • Literature for parents
  • Research Projects
    • RestoreGut
    • COPSYCH Research Alliance
    • HEDIMED Consortium
    • EDIAQI Consortium
    • EAGLE Consortium
    • EarlyVir
  • Strategy
  • ‌

Observer variability of lung function measurements in 2-6-yr-old children.

    Home Publications Observer variability of lung function measurements in 2-6-yr-old children.
    NextPrevious

    Observer variability of lung function measurements in 2-6-yr-old children.

    By Dansk Børne Astma Center | Publications | Comments are Closed | 11 September, 2000 |

    Eur Respir J. 2000 Sep
    Klug B, Nielsen KG, Bisgaard H.

    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to assess the within-observer and between-observer variability of lung function measurements in children aged 2-6 yrs. Two observers examined 22 asthmatic children independently according to a predefined protocol. Each observer obtained duplicate measurements of respiratory resistance by the interrupter technique (Rint), respiratory resistance (Rrs,5) and reactance (Xrs,5) at 5 Hz by the impulse oscillation technique and the specific airway resistance (sRaw) by whole body plethysmography. The within-subject SD (SDw) was not significantly different in the two observers. The ratio SDw between observers/mean SDw within observers was 0.94, 1.25, 1.35 and 2.86 for Xrs,5, Rrs,5, sRaw and Rint, respectively, indicating greater between-observer variability of the latter. The systematic difference between observers assessed by the difference between observer means (expressed as a percentage of their mean value) was 11, 7, 6 and 2% for Xrs,5, sRaw, Rrs,5 and Rint, respectively. These differences were statistically significant, except that for Rint. In conclusion, specific airway resistance, impulse oscillation technique and respiratory resistance assessed by the interrupter technique measurements in young children are subject to influence by the observer, and the random variability between observers appears to be particularly great for respiratory resistance assessed by the interrupter technique. The authors suggest that the between-observer variability should be investigated when evaluating novel methods for testing lung function.

    Comment in
    Not all laboratories are alike. [Eur Respir J. 2001]

    PMID: 11028662

    No tags.
    NextPrevious

    CONTACT

    COPSAC
    Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood
    Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev-Gentofte
    phone +45 3867 7360
    contact@copsac.com
    COPSAC • Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev-Gentofte • Denmark © 2023
    • About COPSAC
      • About
      • Organization Diagram
      • Board of Directors
      • Research team
      • Location
      • Funding
      • Logo
      • Open positions
    • COPSAC cohorts
      • COPSAC2000 cohort
      • COPSAC2010 cohort
      • COPSACSEVERE cohort
      • COPSACACUTE cohort
      • Methods
      • Data overview
        • COPSAC2000 Clinic
        • COPSAC2000 Exposures
        • COPSAC2000 Omics
        • COPSAC2000 Biobank
        • COPSAC2010 Clinic
        • COPSAC2010 Exposures
        • COPSAC2010 Omics
        • COPSAC2010 Biobank
    • Dissemination
      • Theses
      • Literature for parents
    • Research Projects
      • RestoreGut
      • COPSYCH Research Alliance
      • HEDIMED Consortium
      • EDIAQI Consortium
      • EAGLE Consortium
      • EarlyVir
    • Strategy
    • ‌
    COPSAC